So as I've said, neither of the two dominant parties in the United States is really the Latinx party.
The Democrat party is basically a Black's party. It caters to and props up the Blacks over Latinx. Oh yes it does! Did you not notice that the first non-White president was a Black Democrat? I'm sure you've noticed that the first female (and non-White) vice-president is also a Black Democrat. Oh yes, the Democrat party is a Black party and Latinx need to flee from it like the devil flees holy water. The Democrats cater to us just enough to get our votes but always prop up the Blacks over Latinx.
If you don't see how much American society props up the Blacks over Latinx just sit down and watch your favorite program. If you can, watch a couple of hours of it. As you sit there and watch your favorite program(s) keep a pencil and note pad nearby. As the commercials are played make a hash mark every time you see a Black actor and in another column or row make a hash mark every time you see a Latinx actor. When you're finished watching your program count your hash marks and you'll see that Latinx are highly under-represented despite the fact that there are more Latinx than Blacks in the US. If you're wondering what this has to do with the Democrat party well it's that the Democrat party is very influential in today's media. And when I say "today's media" I'm referring to movies, television, music, sports, magazines, newspapers, marketing, advertising, etc. The entire United States media, heavily influenced by the Democrats, systematically snub the Latinx population.
The Republican party fails in that instead of assimilating the Latinx population it antagonizes it. The Republican party wants to build borders and walls. The Republican party wants to uphold the constitution, specially its second amendment. It's not uncommon for far-right extremists to cite the founding fathers on a regular basis. They really want to have their firearms and they never fail to cite that the second amendment specifically says "shall not be infringed." But their patriotism seems to end there. They never mention that the founding fathers, the same ones who established the constitution and this country also wanted the native Americans assimilated into American society. As I mentioned in my previous post both George Washington and Thomas Jefferson as well as many of their contemporaries wanted to establish laws that made it easier for the native Americans to be assimilated into their society. Some even wanted to offer free education to the children of mixed native American and White backgrounds. But unfortunately there was too much antagonism from the White settlers who couldn't see themselves mixing with the digger Indians. Instead of assimilating the natives, the settlers slaughtered the natives, stole the land, and sent the survivors into reservations. Now we have certain groups demand that the constitution, specially the second amendment, be upheld but never mention how they didn't follow through with the founders' wishes of assimilating the natives into their society. Yes, they want their firearms but they don't want the red-skins. Well, if you want your firearms you also get the red-skins (A.K.A today's "brown" people.) And if you don't want the brownies well I guess you don't get your firearms neither.